header-logo header-logo

profile-sm_7

Adrian Keane

Emeritus Professor of Law
Adrian Keane, Emeritus Professor of Law, City, University of London, and author, with Associate Professor Paul McKeown, City, University of London, of The Modern Law of Evidence, 13th edn, OUP.
Emeritus Professor of Law
Adrian Keane, Emeritus Professor of Law, City, University of London, and author, with Associate Professor Paul McKeown, City, University of London, of The Modern Law of Evidence, 13th edn, OUP.
ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR
Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane & Sally Stares analyse the problems with the current directions on the criminal standard of proof
Adrian Keane considers jurors should be given a fuller & more accurate direction before returning their verdict

The issues raised in R v. Cambell need to be reviewed by the House of Lords, says Adrian Keane

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll