AUTHORS
c4d89599fe284e53a2c201fcc0434162.tmb-biography.jpg?sfvrsn=58bd8082_1)
Tom Pangbourne
View Articles
Tom Pelham
View Articles
Tom Phillips
View Articles
Tom Poole
View Articles
Tom Robinson
View Articles
Tom Royston
View Articles
58cef2cc-38f6-4e85-ad58-b531b103c7ad.tmb-biography.jpg?sfvrsn=e3ae917f_1)
Tom Sprange
View Articles271f845f-bf6f-4ef7-8b8b-bc13fcb717b2.tmb-biography.jpg?sfvrsn=425bf4eb_1)
Tom Webb
View Articles
Tom Welch
View Articles
Tony Child
View Articles
Tony Guise
View ArticlesMOVERS & SHAKERS
Quillon Law—Neil Dooley
Disputes firm expands fraud and investigations practice with partner hire
Charles Russell Speechlys—Vadim Romanoff
Firm strengthens corporate tax and incentives team with partner hire
Burges Salmon—Gary Delderfield & Alec Bennett
Partner and senior associate join pensions team
NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
Paige Coulter of Quinn Emanuel reports on the UK’s first statutory definition of SLAPPs under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023, in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Sophie Houghton of LexisPSL distils the key lesson from recent costs cases: if you want to exceed guideline hourly rates (GHR), you must prove why
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
