header-logo header-logo

Law digest

Subscribe

Stevens v University of Birmingham [2015] EWHC 2300 (QB), [2015] All ER (D) 50 (Aug)

Taukacs v Taukaca [2015] EWHC 2365 (Fam), [2015] All ER (D) 85 (Aug)

Financial Conduct Authority v Da Vinci Invest Ltd [2015] EWHC 2401 (Ch), [2015] All ER (D) 77 (Aug)

Director of Public Prosecutions v Bulmer [2015] EWHC 2323 (Admin), [2015] All ER (D) 342 (Jul)

R (on the application of Nutricia Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health [2015] EWHC 2285 (Admin), [2015] All ER (D) 334 (Jul)

Metropolitan Police Commisisoner v Ahsan [2015] EWHC 2354 (Admin), [2015] All ER (D) 54 (Aug)

Re F (A child) (International relocation: welfare analysis) [2015] EWCA Civ 882, [2015] All ER (D) 90 (Aug)

PK v Mr K and another [2015] EWHC 2316 (Fam), [2015] All ER (D) 67 (Aug)

Lin and another v Commissioner of Police [2015] EWHC 2484 (QB), [2015] All ER (D) 108 (Aug)

Detention Action v Lord Chancellor;Subnom R (on the application of Detention Action) v First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) and others [2015] EWCA Civ 840, [2015] All ER (D) 314 (Jul)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll