header-logo header-logo

Law digest

Subscribe

Event Holding GmbH & Co. KG v OHIM T-353/11, [2013] All ER (D) 123 (Jun)

Apollo Engineering Ltd v James Scott Ltd (Scotland) [2013] UKSC 37, [2013] All ER (D) 116 (Jun)

Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury [2013] UKSC 38, [2013] All ER (D) 164 (Jun)

Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC v AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP [2013] UKSC 35, [2013] All ER (D) 89 (Jun)

Philip Hanby Ltd v Clarke [2013] EWCA Civ 647, [2013] All ER (D) 107 (Jun)

Re H-L (a child) (care proceedings: “necessary” expert evidence) [2013] EWCA Civ 655, [2013] All ER (D) 112 (Jun)

Cruddas v Calvert and others [2013] EWHC 1427 (QB), [2013] All ER (D) 102 (Jun)

Royal Mail Group Ltd v Evans and others [2013] EWHC 1572 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 82 (Jun)

R (on the application of NR) v Local Government Ombudsman [2013] EWHC 1335 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 18 (Jun)

Vallee v Birchwood [2013] EWHC 1449 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 46 (Jun)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll