header-logo header-logo

A Local Authority v Mother and another [2017] All ER (D) 81 (Sep), [2017] Lexis Citation 291

XX v Whittington Hospital NHS Trust [2017] EWHC 2318 (QB) [2017] All ER (D) 80 (Sep)

Brookman v General Medical Council [2017] EWHC 2400 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 03 (Oct)

Rasul v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2017] UKUT 357 (TCC), [2017] All ER (D) 88 (Sep)

R (on the application of Shirley and another) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2017] EWHC 2306 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 79 (Sep)

Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1327, [2017] All ER (D) 84 (Sep)

Mengiste and another v Endowment Fund for the Rehabilitation of Tigray and another [2017] EWCA Civ 1326, [2017] All ER (D) 102 (Sep)

R (on the application of CXF (acting by his mother, his litigation friend)) v Central Bedfordshire Council and another [2017] EWHC 2311 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 77 (Sep)

Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd and another; Lachaux v AOL (UK) Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1334, [2017] All ER (D) 85 (Sep)

Shepherd v Byrne and Partners LLP [2017] EWHC 758 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 179 (May)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Senior associate joins family law team in London

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Firm appoints chief financial officer as it expands Essex office footprint

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll