header-logo header-logo

(Still) lost in the music

25 November 2022 / David Langwallner
Issue: 8004 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property , Media
printer mail-detail
101251
Paying homage or a licence to steal? David Langwallner delves into the tricky topic of musical sampling in copyright law

As established in Part 1 (see ‘Lost in the music’, NLJ, 11 November 2022, p22), musical copyright infringement is a quagmire, with legal doctrine on a collision course with music industry innovations. A preliminary question is: what if you add a new arrangement well and transform the song? Well, CBS Records Australia Ltd v Gross (1989) 15 IPR 385 establishes protection to the new version but non-immunity against copyright infringement. In the vernacular, copyright protection is thin against new arrangements of old airs.

Conscious or unconscious?

Perhaps the leading international case on infringement in a musical copyright context is ABKCO Music Ltd v Harrisongs Music (508 F.Supp. 798 (SDNY 1981)). The case concerned the iconic George Harrison and his equally iconic creation My Sweet Lord. Apart from the grace note guitar introduction, the US District Court judge noted the song was virtually identical to the song He’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll