header-logo header-logo

(Still) lost in the music

25 November 2022 / David Langwallner
Issue: 8004 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property , Media
printer mail-detail
101251
Paying homage or a licence to steal? David Langwallner delves into the tricky topic of musical sampling in copyright law

As established in Part 1 (see ‘Lost in the music’, NLJ, 11 November 2022, p22), musical copyright infringement is a quagmire, with legal doctrine on a collision course with music industry innovations. A preliminary question is: what if you add a new arrangement well and transform the song? Well, CBS Records Australia Ltd v Gross (1989) 15 IPR 385 establishes protection to the new version but non-immunity against copyright infringement. In the vernacular, copyright protection is thin against new arrangements of old airs.

Conscious or unconscious?

Perhaps the leading international case on infringement in a musical copyright context is ABKCO Music Ltd v Harrisongs Music (508 F.Supp. 798 (SDNY 1981)). The case concerned the iconic George Harrison and his equally iconic creation My Sweet Lord. Apart from the grace note guitar introduction, the US District Court judge noted the song was virtually identical to the song He’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll