header-logo header-logo

09 May 2025 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 8115 / Categories: Features , Property , Landlord&tenant , Housing
printer mail-detail

100 not out

217851
Andrew Francis looks back at six pieces of 1925 property legislation, brought into effect by vigorous effort & with a legacy that remains largely intact
  • A celebration and examination of six pieces of legislation that received royal assent 100 years ago, and which still form the bedrock of much property law in 2025.

Thursday, 9 April 1925. This is not a date which occupies a place in the nation’s memory as one of celebration or remembrance. Nor is it one which marks an event revered by those sharing a common faith. The day itself was unremarkable. Records show it was fair and quite warm. The prime minister, Stanley Baldwin, had been in office since the Conservative Party’s victory at the general election in November 1924. The Lord Chancellor, Viscount Cave, held the Great Seal. In the morning, King George V attended the Maundy Service at Westminster Abbey. Across the Atlantic, New York publishers Scribners were getting ready for publication of The Great Gatsby by F Scott Fitzgerald the next day.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll