header-logo header-logo

09 May 2025 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 8115 / Categories: Features , Property , Landlord&tenant , Housing
printer mail-detail

100 not out

217851
Andrew Francis looks back at six pieces of 1925 property legislation, brought into effect by vigorous effort & with a legacy that remains largely intact
  • A celebration and examination of six pieces of legislation that received royal assent 100 years ago, and which still form the bedrock of much property law in 2025.

Thursday, 9 April 1925. This is not a date which occupies a place in the nation’s memory as one of celebration or remembrance. Nor is it one which marks an event revered by those sharing a common faith. The day itself was unremarkable. Records show it was fair and quite warm. The prime minister, Stanley Baldwin, had been in office since the Conservative Party’s victory at the general election in November 1924. The Lord Chancellor, Viscount Cave, held the Great Seal. In the morning, King George V attended the Maundy Service at Westminster Abbey. Across the Atlantic, New York publishers Scribners were getting ready for publication of The Great Gatsby by F Scott Fitzgerald the next day.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott strengthens social housing development offering with senior London appointment

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers strengthens Birmingham real estate team with partner hire

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan expands private client and regulatory teams with new legal directors

NEWS
A mood of cautious optimism has enveloped the criminal law sector following indications the Prime Minister may abandon planned jury reforms
Helping to source the services and providers you need
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
back-to-top-scroll