header-logo header-logo

20:10:2010

12 November 2010 / Jonathan Herring
Issue: 7441 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Jonathan Herring on the death knell of marriage

he twentieth of October 2010. Mark that date in your diary. It was beginning of the end for marriage. On that day the Supreme Court in Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42 made a decisive step toward reducing marriage to a contract: marriage diminished to a private autonomous agreement between individuals.

I say a step towards reducing marriage to a contract because, of course, their lordships were not saying that pre-marriage agreements are now binding contracts. They made it clear that a court could make an ancillary relief order under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 that departed from a “pre-nup” where it would not be fair to hold the parties to the agreement. They gave examples when a pre-nup would not be fair: where it fails to provide for the needs of the children or for the needs of a spouse (paras 76, 77).

However, that should not disguise the fact the decision marks the contractualisation of marriage. In the future, in ancillary relief cases involving a pre-nup

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll