header-logo header-logo

20:10:2010

12 November 2010 / Jonathan Herring
Issue: 7441 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Jonathan Herring on the death knell of marriage

he twentieth of October 2010. Mark that date in your diary. It was beginning of the end for marriage. On that day the Supreme Court in Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42 made a decisive step toward reducing marriage to a contract: marriage diminished to a private autonomous agreement between individuals.

I say a step towards reducing marriage to a contract because, of course, their lordships were not saying that pre-marriage agreements are now binding contracts. They made it clear that a court could make an ancillary relief order under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 that departed from a “pre-nup” where it would not be fair to hold the parties to the agreement. They gave examples when a pre-nup would not be fair: where it fails to provide for the needs of the children or for the needs of a spouse (paras 76, 77).

However, that should not disguise the fact the decision marks the contractualisation of marriage. In the future, in ancillary relief cases involving a pre-nup

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll