header-logo header-logo

13 November 2019
Issue: 7864 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Charities , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

2019 pro bono winners celebrated

Migration was a major theme at the annual awards of Advocate, the charity that organises pro bono work by barristers.

Two barristers from Doughty Street shared the International Pro Bono Barrister of the Year award: Jennifer Robinson for her advice in relation to the brutal killing of Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi Arabian Embassy in Istanbul; and Jelia Sane for her work with Safe Passage, a charity advising asylum seekers.

Anthony Metzer QC of Goldsmith Chambers won Pro Bono QC of the Year for a case where a Netherlands resident was refused access to the UK. Garden Court’s Shu Shin Luh won Junior Pro Bono Barrister of the Year for her work challenging the cuts to weekly subsistence paid to victims of trafficking.

The ceremony was sponsored by LexisNexis and hosted by Mr Justice Knowles.

Judging panel chair Lord Goldsmith QC said: ‘I never fail to be moved reading through the Advocate award applications.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll