header-logo header-logo

13 November 2019
Issue: 7864 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Charities , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

2019 pro bono winners celebrated

Migration was a major theme at the annual awards of Advocate, the charity that organises pro bono work by barristers.

Two barristers from Doughty Street shared the International Pro Bono Barrister of the Year award: Jennifer Robinson for her advice in relation to the brutal killing of Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi Arabian Embassy in Istanbul; and Jelia Sane for her work with Safe Passage, a charity advising asylum seekers.

Anthony Metzer QC of Goldsmith Chambers won Pro Bono QC of the Year for a case where a Netherlands resident was refused access to the UK. Garden Court’s Shu Shin Luh won Junior Pro Bono Barrister of the Year for her work challenging the cuts to weekly subsistence paid to victims of trafficking.

The ceremony was sponsored by LexisNexis and hosted by Mr Justice Knowles.

Judging panel chair Lord Goldsmith QC said: ‘I never fail to be moved reading through the Advocate award applications.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll