header-logo header-logo

21 May 2010 / Alex H Rene , Lista M Cannon
Issue: 7418 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

21st century challenge

Lista M Cannon & Alex H Rene assess compliance confrontations in the wake of the new Bribery Act

The Bribery Act 2010 received Royal Assent on 8 April 2010, over a century after the passing of the laws that established the UK’s framework for the prosecution of bribery and corruption offences. While the Act is expected to come into force later in 2010 (possibly October) businesses must now pay close attention to the offences created by the Act, including the new corporate offence of failing to prevent bribery, and the severe penalties that businesses and individuals may face for failure to comply with the Act.

Bribery of another person

It is an offence under the Act if one “offers, promises or gives a financial or other advantage to another person” intending that person to perform improperly a relevant function or activity. The scope for what might amount to a “financial or other advantage” is broad. A breach occurs where the bribing party knows or believes that the acceptance of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll