header-logo header-logo

24 May 2023
Issue: 8026 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-detail

40% missing from overseas property register

Foreign companies which own UK property may owe fines of almost £1bn for failing to comply with a new law, a solicitor has warned.

Nearly 40% of registered overseas companies which own UK property failed to meet the 31 January deadline to join the Register of Overseas Entities and declare their ultimate owners.

As of 1 February 2023, 12,930 of the 32,440 registered overseas companies had failed to comply, leaving them open to fines of £2,500 per day, a ban on selling their land and possible criminal sanctions for their officers.

The register was set up last August at Companies House, under the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022.

Helen Curtis, corporate partner at Devonshires, said: ‘The register was introduced to disclose who actually owns British property.

‘The intention was to lay bare who is dodging their UK tax obligations. However, the failure to comply rate is shocking.

‘If the 12,930 companies who failed to comply by 31 Jan continued to not comply for the 28 days in February and were fined £2,500 per day, we’re looking at a total amount of £905,100,000– and growing daily.

‘There are more than 50,000 properties across England and Wales held by around 18,000 offshore companies. Of those 18,000 companies, 5,070 were so obtuse with the information they filed that the public still remains in the dark over who ultimately owns and benefits from them.’

In February, business minister Lord Callanan announced increased investigatory powers for Companies House and the Insolvency Service, and up to £20m investment to tackle money laundering by companies that own UK property.

Curtis said: ‘Historically, the UK has been a property hotspot for offshore companies and trusts as it has allowed for a high degree of secrecy for property owners who wish to remain anonymous. However, it has been exploited.’

Issue: 8026 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
back-to-top-scroll