header-logo header-logo

14 August 2008
Issue: 7334 / Categories: Legal News , Damages
printer mail-detail

£4.3m landmark compensation for injured Man United star

Insurance premiums set to rise after club and player admit liability

A decision to award a former trainee footballer, whose career was ended by a negligent tackle, £4.3m will have wide ranging ramifications for all levels of the game, experts say.

Manchester United trainee Ben Collett suffered a double fracture of the lower leg following a tackle by Middlesbrough’s Gary Smith in a reserve match in May 2003. In court both Middlesbrough and Smith admitted that the tackle was “negligent” leaving Mrs Justice Swift to assess the level of compensation that Collett should receive from Middlesbrough’s insurers.

Richard Hartley QC of Cobden House Chambers in Manchester says the ramifications of the judgment will be felt across all levels of football: “Clubs at both amateur and professional standing will need to examine carefully their third party insurance liability cover as cases like this will inevitably become more commonplace.”

Hartley continues: “Individual professionals, even many Premier League stars, have cover which is inadequate, particularly in light of the judgment. In practical terms we deal with an awful lot of these cases where amateur players lose their earnings because of events that happen on a Sunday morning, but why should they put up with it?”

Greg Rollingson, senior partner at Rollingsons Solicitors, says that proving liability is key to any similar claim.

“To succeed in an action for damages, an injured professional footballer would need to show that, on the balance of probabilities, that his opponent would have known that there was a significant risk that if he tackled in the way he did, the other player would be seriously injured,” he says.

Rollingson continues, “Essentially he would have to show that his opponent had been guilty of dangerous and reckless play to establish liability. Football clubs may now find that their insurance premiums increase in light of this judgment”.

Issue: 7334 / Categories: Legal News , Damages
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll