header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 158, Issue 7334

14 August 2008
IN THIS ISSUE

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v Gallagher (Valuation Officer) [2008] UKHL 56, [2008] All ER (D) 416 (Jul)

Wilmot v Selvarajan [2008] EWCA Civ 862, [2008] All ER (D) 310 (Jul)

Back Page: Agony Column

Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office v Allad [2008] EWCA Crim 1741, [2008] All ER (D) 407 (Jul)

Donaldson v O’Sullivan [2008] EWCA Civ 879, [2008] All ER (D) 393 (Jul)

Platform Funding Ltd v Bank of Scotland plc [2008] EWCA Civ 930, [2008] All ER (D) 422 (Jul)

Harris v Perry [2008] EWCA Civ 907, [2008] All ER (D) 415 (Jul)

Lee v Birmingham City Council [2008] EWCA Civ 891, [2008] EWCA Civ 891

Auguring the future. Nicholas Bevan concludes his analysis of Thompstone

Collective redress

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll