header-logo header-logo

Insolvency

14 August 2008
Issue: 7334 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Costs
printer mail-detail

Donaldson v O’Sullivan [2008] EWCA Civ 879, [2008] All ER (D) 393 (Jul)

Section 303(2) of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) empowers the court to appoint a new trustee in bankruptcy, which enables it to replace a trustee removed under s 298. That is also the position in compulsory liquidations under s 168(3).

Moreover, ss 292 and 297 of IA 1986 ought not to be construed so as to preclude the court from using its general powers, in relation to bankruptcy or compulsory liquidation, to appoint a new trustee in bankruptcy or liquidator upon removing such an office holder under s 298 or s 172.

Issue: 7334 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll