header-logo header-logo

14 August 2008
Issue: 7334 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Consumer power

Collective redress

Consumers and small businesses will be able to pursue compensation claims via a collective redress system if Civil Justice Council (CJC) proposals are adopted.

The CJC recommends an increasing the number of organisations that can bring claims and changes to laws to permit the award of aggregate damages. Robert Musgrove, chief executive of the CJC, says the proposal is not a licence to lawyers or funders to “drum up litigation for personal profit” but an improvement in access to justice to allow legitimate claims to be brought.

Musgrove says: “The recommendations contain a number of procedural mechanisms that protect defendants, and place the casemanaging judge in control at all stages of the claim; from certification of merits, agreement of the funding arrangements, rigorous case management of the claim, and authority over the final settlement”.

Steve Brooker, policy expert for the National Consumer Council says it should be possible in future for cases to be brought on an opt-out basis.

“[This] is best suited for dealing with claims involving relatively small sums for the individuals affected, but that would allow companies to build up large windfalls if the claims were not otherwise pursued,” he adds.

Issue: 7334 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll