header-logo header-logo

Consumer power

14 August 2008
Issue: 7334 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Collective redress

Consumers and small businesses will be able to pursue compensation claims via a collective redress system if Civil Justice Council (CJC) proposals are adopted.

The CJC recommends an increasing the number of organisations that can bring claims and changes to laws to permit the award of aggregate damages. Robert Musgrove, chief executive of the CJC, says the proposal is not a licence to lawyers or funders to “drum up litigation for personal profit” but an improvement in access to justice to allow legitimate claims to be brought.

Musgrove says: “The recommendations contain a number of procedural mechanisms that protect defendants, and place the casemanaging judge in control at all stages of the claim; from certification of merits, agreement of the funding arrangements, rigorous case management of the claim, and authority over the final settlement”.

Steve Brooker, policy expert for the National Consumer Council says it should be possible in future for cases to be brought on an opt-out basis.

“[This] is best suited for dealing with claims involving relatively small sums for the individuals affected, but that would allow companies to build up large windfalls if the claims were not otherwise pursued,” he adds.

Issue: 7334 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll