header-logo header-logo

14 August 2008
Issue: 7334 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Consumer power

Collective redress

Consumers and small businesses will be able to pursue compensation claims via a collective redress system if Civil Justice Council (CJC) proposals are adopted.

The CJC recommends an increasing the number of organisations that can bring claims and changes to laws to permit the award of aggregate damages. Robert Musgrove, chief executive of the CJC, says the proposal is not a licence to lawyers or funders to “drum up litigation for personal profit” but an improvement in access to justice to allow legitimate claims to be brought.

Musgrove says: “The recommendations contain a number of procedural mechanisms that protect defendants, and place the casemanaging judge in control at all stages of the claim; from certification of merits, agreement of the funding arrangements, rigorous case management of the claim, and authority over the final settlement”.

Steve Brooker, policy expert for the National Consumer Council says it should be possible in future for cases to be brought on an opt-out basis.

“[This] is best suited for dealing with claims involving relatively small sums for the individuals affected, but that would allow companies to build up large windfalls if the claims were not otherwise pursued,” he adds.

Issue: 7334 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll