header-logo header-logo

04 October 2018
Issue: 7811 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

£4m shortfall could spark direct action protests

The Criminal Bar Association (CBA) is consulting heads of chambers about potentially resuming direct action protests unless the government fulfils its promise of extra funds.

In May, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) offered criminal barristers an extra £15m for publicly funded defence work in the Crown Court in return for the Bar suspending its boycott of reforms to the Advocates’ Graduated Fee Scheme.

The deal was struck to prevent criminal barristers from engaging in an additional ‘no returns’ protest, under which barristers would refuse to cover for each other on cases where there was a timetable clash.

A 51.5% majority of more than 3,000 criminal barristers voted to accept the MoJ offer. However, CBA chair Chris Henley QC says the current form of the scheme, when applied to 2017–18 figures, would fall £4m short of the promise. He has also complained about delays to the four-week MoJ consultation on the spending increase. It was originally pitched to begin in mid-July, did not start until 31 August and has now been extended by a further fortnight to 12 October.

In his message to members this week, Henley said: ‘£15m must mean £15m. Every week that passes saves the MoJ money. The 1% [increase in fees] scheduled for April must be brought forward to compensate.

‘The delay is causing increasing anger, as are some of the fees now being billed under the new scheme.’

Henley said a barrister was recently paid a fee of only £900 for a guilty plea in a multihanded rape and grooming case with 15,000 pages of evidence. ‘Fees at this level for many, many hours of work, and the heavy professional responsibility, will decimate career progression and threaten the viability of chambers,’ he added.

Issue: 7811 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll