header-logo header-logo

31 March 2023 / David Burrows
Issue: 8019 / Categories: Features , Family , Mediation , ADR
printer mail-detail

50 years in family law

117285
In a very special article, David Burrows marks half a century at the coalface: has anything changed for the better?
  • The key changes in the family law field over the last 50 years, including in children law, judicial case management, mediation, child support, and the splitting-out of family proceedings from the wider community of civil proceedings.

On 1 March 1973, I was admitted as a solicitor of the Supreme Court. I have a certificate signed by ‘Denning M.R.’ (Lord Denning was then Master of the Rolls). I later mutated—without anyone asking if I minded (I do)—to being a solicitor of the senior courts. Somewhere in the middle of all that (July 1997), I was renamed a ‘solicitor advocate’. I was then allowed to appear as advocate in all courts.

Five areas of law—mostly family law (my specialist area, loosely interpreted)—have developed in those 50 years, not always for the better:

  • children law;
  • judicial case management;
  • mediation in family law;
  • child support; and
  • ghettoisation of family proceedings
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll