header-logo header-logo

31 March 2023 / David Burrows
Issue: 8019 / Categories: Features , Family , Mediation , ADR
printer mail-detail

50 years in family law

117285
In a very special article, David Burrows marks half a century at the coalface: has anything changed for the better?
  • The key changes in the family law field over the last 50 years, including in children law, judicial case management, mediation, child support, and the splitting-out of family proceedings from the wider community of civil proceedings.

On 1 March 1973, I was admitted as a solicitor of the Supreme Court. I have a certificate signed by ‘Denning M.R.’ (Lord Denning was then Master of the Rolls). I later mutated—without anyone asking if I minded (I do)—to being a solicitor of the senior courts. Somewhere in the middle of all that (July 1997), I was renamed a ‘solicitor advocate’. I was then allowed to appear as advocate in all courts.

Five areas of law—mostly family law (my specialist area, loosely interpreted)—have developed in those 50 years, not always for the better:

  • children law;
  • judicial case management;
  • mediation in family law;
  • child support; and
  • ghettoisation of family proceedings
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll