header-logo header-logo

£51m rescue package for criminal lawyers

24 August 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal
printer mail-detail
Lawyers have given a cautious welcome to news the government will give a further £51m for the struggling legal aid sector

The Lord Chancellor, Robert Buckland said last week the funds would go towards criminal advocates and solicitors, recognising the long hours spent preparing cases, including reviewing digital evidence. The money will fund: new payments for reviewing unused material; additional payments, on an hourly rate, for advocates where there are exceptionally high volumes of prosecution evidence; increased payments for preparation of cases that fall when a plea is given in the first hearing; and new payments for solicitors for their work ahead of sending cases to the Crown court.

Ministers have also confirmed that an independent review of the criminal legal aid market will begin later this year.

Amanda Pinto QC, Chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘This money is desperately needed and long overdue for criminal legal aid barristers, who do crucial work in the public interest and, having been badly hit by years of cuts, have suffered drastic loss of work during the pandemic.

‘We are pleased that, at last, barristers are paid for work they are obliged to do to prepare cases properly for court. Nonetheless, the rates of pay must be revisited as part of the wider independent review, which we look forward to engaging with, to ensure the sustainability of this vital provision. Without further support from the government we fear that this great public service will disappear.’

Martin Rackstraw, criminal litigation partner at Russell-Cooke, said the additional funding ‘sounds impressive, but it is far too little and far too late.

‘Legal aid lawyers working in criminal defence have not seen an increase in payment rates for almost 20 years, and in many areas of their work, rates have been significantly reduced. As a result, lawyers are leaving criminal work as it becomes financially unviable. This announcement will do almost nothing to reverse this trend.

‘If the government is serious about access to justice it will need to ensure that legal aid is properly and fairly funded.’

Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll