header-logo header-logo

24 August 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal
printer mail-detail

£51m rescue package for criminal lawyers

Lawyers have given a cautious welcome to news the government will give a further £51m for the struggling legal aid sector

The Lord Chancellor, Robert Buckland said last week the funds would go towards criminal advocates and solicitors, recognising the long hours spent preparing cases, including reviewing digital evidence. The money will fund: new payments for reviewing unused material; additional payments, on an hourly rate, for advocates where there are exceptionally high volumes of prosecution evidence; increased payments for preparation of cases that fall when a plea is given in the first hearing; and new payments for solicitors for their work ahead of sending cases to the Crown court.

Ministers have also confirmed that an independent review of the criminal legal aid market will begin later this year.

Amanda Pinto QC, Chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘This money is desperately needed and long overdue for criminal legal aid barristers, who do crucial work in the public interest and, having been badly hit by years of cuts, have suffered drastic loss of work during the pandemic.

‘We are pleased that, at last, barristers are paid for work they are obliged to do to prepare cases properly for court. Nonetheless, the rates of pay must be revisited as part of the wider independent review, which we look forward to engaging with, to ensure the sustainability of this vital provision. Without further support from the government we fear that this great public service will disappear.’

Martin Rackstraw, criminal litigation partner at Russell-Cooke, said the additional funding ‘sounds impressive, but it is far too little and far too late.

‘Legal aid lawyers working in criminal defence have not seen an increase in payment rates for almost 20 years, and in many areas of their work, rates have been significantly reduced. As a result, lawyers are leaving criminal work as it becomes financially unviable. This announcement will do almost nothing to reverse this trend.

‘If the government is serious about access to justice it will need to ensure that legal aid is properly and fairly funded.’

Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll