header-logo header-logo

03 December 2025
Issue: 8142 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Technology , Artificial intelligence , Risk management
printer mail-detail

Bar Council warns against risks of AI

Barristers have been warned to be on guard against anthropomorphism, hallucinations, information disorder, bias in data training, mistakes, data protection blunders and confidential data leaks when using generative artificial intelligence (AI)

These are some of the main risks with large language models (LLMs), highlighted in updated Bar Council ethics and practice guidance. The guidance concludes barristers must remember that they are ultimately responsible for any legal work produced.

AI-hallucinated fake cases and citations have been accidentally included by lawyers acting in a number of cases this year.

The updated ethics guidance highlights the fact that LLMs do not have a conscience or social and emotional intelligence. It refers to recent case law on the subject as well as academic research into the reliability of AI research.

Barbara Mills KC, chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘As the guidance explains, the best-placed barristers will be those who make the efforts to understand these systems so that they can be used with control and integrity.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll