header-logo header-logo

03 December 2025
Issue: 8142 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Technology , Artificial intelligence , Risk management
printer mail-detail

Bar Council warns against risks of AI

Barristers have been warned to be on guard against anthropomorphism, hallucinations, information disorder, bias in data training, mistakes, data protection blunders and confidential data leaks when using generative artificial intelligence (AI)

These are some of the main risks with large language models (LLMs), highlighted in updated Bar Council ethics and practice guidance. The guidance concludes barristers must remember that they are ultimately responsible for any legal work produced.

AI-hallucinated fake cases and citations have been accidentally included by lawyers acting in a number of cases this year.

The updated ethics guidance highlights the fact that LLMs do not have a conscience or social and emotional intelligence. It refers to recent case law on the subject as well as academic research into the reliability of AI research.

Barbara Mills KC, chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘As the guidance explains, the best-placed barristers will be those who make the efforts to understand these systems so that they can be used with control and integrity.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll