header-logo header-logo

03 December 2025
Issue: 8142 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Compensation
printer mail-detail

More changes to the Employment Bill?

MPs will vote next week on an amendment to fast-track the change to the unfair dismissal qualifying period, as the government’s flagship Employment Rights Bill returns to the Commons

Angela Rayner MP’s amendment would implement the change next April rather than April 2027—while the Bill itself is scheduled to come into force in April 2026, the qualifying period is delayed until 2027 to give employers more consultation time.

Last week, ministers scrapped their manifesto plans for day-one protection from unfair dismissal, instead reducing the current 24-month period to six months in order to ensure the legislation passes through the House of Lords in time.

Lawyers have largely welcomed the U-turn.

Jo Mackie, employment partner at Michelmores, said a day-one right to unfair dismissal would have been ‘unwieldy and unworkable and we predicted this would happen as soon as it was launched.

‘Probation periods are important for both employees and employers and the tribunals would really have struggled to keep up with the raft of new claims that would have arisen’.

Rena Magdani, partner at Freeths, said the decision ‘offers clarity to employers and employees and avoids what would likely have been complexity and uncertainty generated by the government’s proposed “light-touch procedure” during an “initial period of employment”’.

Ministers also confirmed last week the unfair dismissal compensation cap will be lifted.

Magdani said: ‘The current compensation cap is the lower of one year’s pay or £118,223. 

‘While the average unfair dismissal award is significantly lower than this cap, if the cap is significantly increased or removed, then the level of exposure to employers in unfair dismissal claims will increase, particularly in cases of high-earners, or those whose dismissal results in them leaving defined benefit pension schemes, or employees who struggle to find alternative employment.’

The Bill will retain day-one rights to sick pay and paternity leave.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll