header-logo header-logo

More changes to the Employment Bill?

03 December 2025
Issue: 8142 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Compensation
printer mail-detail
MPs will vote next week on an amendment to fast-track the change to the unfair dismissal qualifying period, as the government’s flagship Employment Rights Bill returns to the Commons

Angela Rayner MP’s amendment would implement the change next April rather than April 2027—while the Bill itself is scheduled to come into force in April 2026, the qualifying period is delayed until 2027 to give employers more consultation time.

Last week, ministers scrapped their manifesto plans for day-one protection from unfair dismissal, instead reducing the current 24-month period to six months in order to ensure the legislation passes through the House of Lords in time.

Lawyers have largely welcomed the U-turn.

Jo Mackie, employment partner at Michelmores, said a day-one right to unfair dismissal would have been ‘unwieldy and unworkable and we predicted this would happen as soon as it was launched.

‘Probation periods are important for both employees and employers and the tribunals would really have struggled to keep up with the raft of new claims that would have arisen’.

Rena Magdani, partner at Freeths, said the decision ‘offers clarity to employers and employees and avoids what would likely have been complexity and uncertainty generated by the government’s proposed “light-touch procedure” during an “initial period of employment”’.

Ministers also confirmed last week the unfair dismissal compensation cap will be lifted.

Magdani said: ‘The current compensation cap is the lower of one year’s pay or £118,223. 

‘While the average unfair dismissal award is significantly lower than this cap, if the cap is significantly increased or removed, then the level of exposure to employers in unfair dismissal claims will increase, particularly in cases of high-earners, or those whose dismissal results in them leaving defined benefit pension schemes, or employees who struggle to find alternative employment.’

The Bill will retain day-one rights to sick pay and paternity leave.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Moore Barlow—Jess Ready & Natasha Jones

Moore Barlow—Jess Ready & Natasha Jones

Commercial property and corporate teams expand in Southampton

Watershed—Rob Elliott

Watershed—Rob Elliott

Employment firm expands capability with experienced hire

Devonshires—Aoife Murphy & Mandeep Sahota

Devonshires—Aoife Murphy & Mandeep Sahota

Housing management and property litigation team bolstered by partner hires

NEWS
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll