header-logo header-logo

12 February 2016
Issue: 7687 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

86 courts & tribunals to close

Lawyers lament announcement of planned closure of 86 courts by MoJ

The government’s decision to close 86 courts and tribunals is a sign that “the days of the local county court are gone”.

Last week, the Ministry of Justice announced that it would shut all but five of 91 courts and tribunals originally earmarked for closure. The five are Bath, Carmarthen, St Helens, Stockport and West Cumbria. Some 64 of the sites will close as proposed in the consultation on the closures last July, and alternative venues may be found for the remaining 22.

David Greene, NLJ consultant editor and senior partner at Edwin Coe, laments the decision as “further distancing individuals geographically from the civil justice process”.

However, he adds: “We should not, of course, tie ourselves to the delivery of civil justice within the old framework.

“Old-style establishments may represent the anachronistic ‘majesté’ of the law but can be places of alienation from the law. Civil justice can be delivered in different ways and the Briggs proposals for online courts may be a step towards that end.

“The problem in the short term is that there is no replacement for the courts that are closing; the cart that is court closures seems to have jumped ahead of the horse that is the Briggs proposals.”

Last month, Lord Briggs proposed that civil disputes valued at less than £25,000 could be dealt with by an online court, in his interim report on civil justice.

In a statement to Parliament last week, Justice minister Shailesh Vara said the government is investing £700m over the next four years in IT systems, modern technology and building updates. He said nearly half of all courts and tribunals are empty for half their available hearing time.

“Court closures are difficult decisions; local communities have strong allegiances to their local courts and I understand their concerns,” Vara said.

“But changes to the estate are vital if we are to modernise a system which everybody accepts is unwieldy, inefficient, slow, expensive to maintain and unduly bureaucratic.”

Family lawyers' group Resolution say the proposed closures are “devastating”, particularly for “victims of domestic abuse, young people and those who rely on public transport to get around”.

Issue: 7687 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

Mark Hastings, founding partner of Quillon Law, on turning dreams into reality and pushing back on preconceptions about partnership

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

New family law partner for Italian and international clients appointed

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Firm elects new chair of tier 1 ranked employment department

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll