header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

A (dis)honest mistake?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
15 September 2023 / Sam Thomas , Manon Huckle , Oliver Cooke , Richard Marshall
Issue: 8040 / Categories: Features , Contempt
printer mail-detail
137526
The concept of reckless falsity has been rejected by the Court of Appeal: Sam Thomas, Manon Huckle, Oliver Cooke & Richard Marshall assess some key takeaways for contempt of court applications
  • For permission for an application for contempt of court to be granted, the court must be satisfied that there is a strong case that a person knowingly, and so dishonestly, misled the court.
  • The concept of reckless falsity has been rejected.
  • There is no different test or higher standard required of police officers.

Can a reckless misstatement be a contempt of court? Is evidence unchecked and incorrect, under a statement of truth, enough for a potential prison sentence? Or is honest negligence a defence to an allegation of making a false statement?

Reckless falsity

Ten years ago, in Berry Piling Systems Ltd v Sheer Projects Ltd [2013] EWHC 347 (TCC), [2013] All ER (D) 42 (Mar), Mr Justice Akenhead concluded that a reckless disregard for the truth of a statement was sufficient for contempt

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Freeths—Suzanne Porter

Freeths—Suzanne Porter

Firm launches trusts, estates and tax practice in the north with senior hire

Fieldfisher—Guy Forster

Fieldfisher—Guy Forster

Personal injury and medical negligence team strengthened by partner hire

mfg Solicitors—Richard Port

mfg Solicitors—Richard Port

Firm appoints partner and head of family in Birmingham office

NEWS
Read All
AlphaBiolabs supports The Christie Charity with £500 Giving Back donation
AlphaBiolabs has donated £500 to The Christie Charity through its Giving Back initiative, helping to support cancer care, treatment and research across Greater Manchester, Cheshire and further afield
Cautious support for proposed reforms to homebuying process
CILEX has called for a review of conveyancing fees and stronger regulation of the high-volume residential property sector, in its response to government proposals for homebuying reforms
Time to stir the pension pot?
Pension provision should be considered during all divorce proceedings in order to repair gender inequality, the Pension Policy Institute (PPI) charity and workplace pensions provider now:pensions have said
Government moving 'too far too fast' on cryptoassets?
‘Over-regulating’ the cryptoassets sector could stifle growth when the government brings regulations into force in 2027, a digital assets lawyer has warned
Guideline hourly rates on the rise
Solicitors received a new year’s boost this month with the announcement of an uplift to the guideline hourly rates
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll