header-logo header-logo

19 November 2021 / David Greene
Issue: 7957 / Categories: Opinion , Collective action , Privacy
printer mail-detail

A bumpy ride ahead for Google?

64414
Google and its detractors suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, as David Greene reports

Last week was an action-packed week for Google Inc on the swings and roundabouts of the judicial process; winning in the Supreme Court against a consumer campaigner seeking to bring a class action for an estimated four million iPhone users, but losing to the European Commission in the General Court of the European Court of Justice. Both decisions are of heightened significance for the legal community; closing the door on one aspect of domestic class actions but opening another door to many years of litigation for Google and its regulatory detractors.

Lloyd v Google ([2021] UKSC 50)

Richard Lloyd, a consumer campaigner, brought a claim against Google after Google agreed to pay hefty fines to the US Federal Trade Commission in relation to the misuse of customers’ data through its DoubleClick Ad software. Claims followed in the courts with a US class action and a claim here by three individuals (Vidal-Hall v Google).

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll