header-logo header-logo

15 November 2024 / Roger Smith
Issue: 8094 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

A cold wind blows

196803
Roger Smith on why he believes the model of civil legal aid developed as part of the post-war welfare state is bust

The Autumn budget provides little comfort for civil legal aid practitioners. The good news was that the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) overall budget was increased by just under £14m—an annual increase of 5.6%. The bad news was that this largely went on new prison places, more staff and ‘thousands of new electronic tags to monitor offenders’. There was not a word about addressing the crisis in civil legal aid.

That crisis has been documented by the Law Society for some time. It is true that the society is not exactly an impartial source. Its members are hurting here. But few objective observers could quibble with Chancery Lane’s plea for a full ministerial review of legal aid back in February: ‘Without immediate cash investment, civil legal aid providers are facing an existential crisis. Over the past decade the number of legal aid firms has nearly halved, while the number of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
back-to-top-scroll