header-logo header-logo

21 October 2022 / Cameron Laing
Issue: 7999 / Categories: Features , Collective action , Competition
printer mail-detail

A green light for collective proceedings?

98020
The Competition Appeal Tribunal’s desire to breathe life into the collective proceedings regime is clear from its CPO approval rate & reluctance to strike out or summarily dismiss claims: Cameron Laing assesses the impact of its approach thus far
  • The Competition Appeal Tribunal has been adjudicating on an increasing number of applications for opt-out collective proceedings orders. The tribunal has been routinely granting these kinds of applications.
  • Prospective defendants who do not consider that claims brought against them have merit are able to apply for an order that the claims be struck out or summarily dismissed.

Since the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015) came into force on 1 October 2015, the ability for a prospective claimant to bring a class action before the courts of the United Kingdom has been greatly enhanced. Previously, would-be litigants whose claims involved materially similar issues of law or fact were required to unify them by obtaining either a group litigation order (in which each claimant still has to initiate their own

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll