header-logo header-logo

04 October 2024 / John O'Hare
Issue: 8088 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

A lesson in PD 45 calculations

191456
Fixed costs in intermediate track cases: how to calculate what’s recoverable, by John O’Hare
  • Gives guidance on three of the calculations in PD 45, Table 14 that dictate the amount paid to the winner in intermediate track cases, based on: the stage in the proceedings at conclusion; the complexity band; and the addition of certain extra costs.

Practice Direction 45, Table 14 applies to most (but not all) cases allocated to the intermediate track. The amount payable to the winner (claimant or defendant) is dependent on five calculations:

i. the stage in the proceedings when the case was won;

ii. the complexity band to which the case had previously been assigned;

and where appropriate:

iii. the addition of certain extra costs and disbursements;

iv. increases which may be allowed; and/or

v. reductions which may be imposed.

Guidance as to the first three calculations is given below. The other two (eg, London weighting, VAT, reductions to be made because of unreasonable behaviour by the receiving party) are not covered

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll