John O'Hare
Retired costs judge
John O’Hare is a retired costs judge.
Retired costs judge
John O’Hare is a retired costs judge.
John O’Hare states some home truths about mediation
Fixed costs in intermediate track cases: how to calculate what’s recoverable, by John O’Hare
John O’Hare explores the options available to help people with financial troubles
John O’Hare examines the new law on small claims which has led to insurers paying less to lawyers
John O’Hare provides an overview of changes & duplication to disclosure procedures in the Business & Property Courts
John O’Hare on how to reduce costs which are reasonable but disproportionate
John O'Hare provides practical advice on revising a costs management budget
John O’Hare's 10-point guide to drafting a costs budget for the first CMC
Show
8
Results
8
MOVERS & SHAKERS
Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton
Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner
Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan
Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office
Blake Morgan—four promotions
Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices
NEWS
The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
