header-logo header-logo

Drafting matters

19 September 2013 / John O'Hare
Issue: 7576 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail
istock_000015828383small

John O’Hare's 10-point guide to drafting a costs budget for the first CMC

IN BRIEF

This guide assumes you have already decided upon the directions you will be seeking at the case management conference and have to hand the standard form of budget (Precedent H) and the Ministry of Justice Guidance Notes on Precedent H (both obtainable via www.justice.gov.uk).

1. Decide how much detail it will be necessary to give

If the grand total does not exceed £25,000 there is no obligation to complete more than the first page, ie list of phases, totals for each, assumptions made etc.

2. Start at the end: the trial

How many days will it last? Who will be instructed to appear for the client as advocates at that stage, what fees will they charge, how many fee earners will also attend (more than one is unusual) and of what grade? If you are using a spreadsheet form of the budget, any arithmetic you

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll