header-logo header-logo

Making it all add up

10 October 2013 / John O'Hare
Issue: 7579 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

John O'Hare provides practical advice on revising a costs management budget

Costs management budgets are not costs caps; the court will expect the parties to regularly review them and to either agree, or apply for, revisions when necessary. It is most unlikely that anyone will be able to predict all the significant developments which will later occur in the course of a case, however carefully they drafted the first budget. Practice Direction 3E, para 2.6 refers to the making of revisions (upwards or downwards) if significant developments warrant them using words of obligation: “Each party shall revise its budget.”

Revisions are likely to be agreed or allowed whenever it becomes clear that any of the assumptions listed on the first page of the budget is false. Similarly, every budget is subject to certain implied assumptions (that opponents will not serve unnecessarily prolix pleadings or witness statements, or be uncooperative as to site inspections or inspection of documents). When setting your first budget

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll