header-logo header-logo

10 October 2013 / John O'Hare
Issue: 7579 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Making it all add up

John O'Hare provides practical advice on revising a costs management budget

Costs management budgets are not costs caps; the court will expect the parties to regularly review them and to either agree, or apply for, revisions when necessary. It is most unlikely that anyone will be able to predict all the significant developments which will later occur in the course of a case, however carefully they drafted the first budget. Practice Direction 3E, para 2.6 refers to the making of revisions (upwards or downwards) if significant developments warrant them using words of obligation: “Each party shall revise its budget.”

Revisions are likely to be agreed or allowed whenever it becomes clear that any of the assumptions listed on the first page of the budget is false. Similarly, every budget is subject to certain implied assumptions (that opponents will not serve unnecessarily prolix pleadings or witness statements, or be uncooperative as to site inspections or inspection of documents). When setting your first budget

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll