header-logo header-logo

A matter of time

31 January 2019 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7826 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail
There is no limitation period in English criminal law in respect of serious criminal offences. Alec Samuels reports
  • Limitation periods and prosecuting after long delays.

Alimitation period, eg 12 years, is common in continental countries. The arguments against allowing a prosecution after delay, especially long delay, have arisen in the context of alleged offences by British soldiers in Northern Ireland at ‘Bloody Sunday’ in 1972, and in the case of alleged offences of historic sex, eg Field Marshal Lord Bramall, Lord Brittan QC, Lord Janner QC, Mr Paul Gambaccini, Mr Harvey Proctor, and Sir Cliff Richard, none of whom (apart from Lord Janner) has ever been charged.

The defence will claim prejudice, the impossibility of a fair trial. Memories will have faded; witnesses will be unreliable, or untraceable, or dead; no DNA evidence will be available; no records; no photographs; and corroboration is not legally required. D will be seriously handicapped in conducting a defence. The trial will become ‘his word against mine’. D will in effect have to prove his innocence. The credibility

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll