header-logo header-logo

17 November 2023 / Imran Khodabocus
Issue: 8049 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

A missed opportunity to tackle honour-based abuse?

146633
Imran Khodabocus calls for honour-based abuse to be given a legal definition
  • Highlights that missed opportunity to establish a legal definition for honour-based abuse perpetuates the current lack of guidance and cohesive response.
  • Covers the urgent need for training for different agencies—and how this might be implemented.
  • Explains why barriers for victims and lack of protocol exacerbate the status of honour-based abuse as a hidden crime.

In September, the government responded to recommendations made by the Women and Equalities Committee (WEC) regarding honour-based abuse. The response rejected calls by the WEC to establish a legal definition of this type of abuse, as the government claims it already has a working definition used by the Home Office and Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).

As a lawyer working on diverse cases of honour-based abuse, this seems to me to be a missed opportunity.

As the WEC pointed out, honour-based abuse remains a hidden crime and one that victims are hesitant to report without having greater assurance that they will be protected

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll