header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
17 November 2023 / Imran Khodabocus
Issue: 8049 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

A missed opportunity to tackle honour-based abuse?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
146633
Imran Khodabocus calls for honour-based abuse to be given a legal definition
  • Highlights that missed opportunity to establish a legal definition for honour-based abuse perpetuates the current lack of guidance and cohesive response.
  • Covers the urgent need for training for different agencies—and how this might be implemented.
  • Explains why barriers for victims and lack of protocol exacerbate the status of honour-based abuse as a hidden crime.

In September, the government responded to recommendations made by the Women and Equalities Committee (WEC) regarding honour-based abuse. The response rejected calls by the WEC to establish a legal definition of this type of abuse, as the government claims it already has a working definition used by the Home Office and Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).

As a lawyer working on diverse cases of honour-based abuse, this seems to me to be a missed opportunity.

As the WEC pointed out, honour-based abuse remains a hidden crime and one that victims are hesitant to report without having greater assurance that they will be protected

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll