header-logo header-logo

A missed opportunity to tackle honour-based abuse?

17 November 2023 / Imran Khodabocus
Issue: 8049 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
146633
Imran Khodabocus calls for honour-based abuse to be given a legal definition
  • Highlights that missed opportunity to establish a legal definition for honour-based abuse perpetuates the current lack of guidance and cohesive response.
  • Covers the urgent need for training for different agencies—and how this might be implemented.
  • Explains why barriers for victims and lack of protocol exacerbate the status of honour-based abuse as a hidden crime.

In September, the government responded to recommendations made by the Women and Equalities Committee (WEC) regarding honour-based abuse. The response rejected calls by the WEC to establish a legal definition of this type of abuse, as the government claims it already has a working definition used by the Home Office and Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).

As a lawyer working on diverse cases of honour-based abuse, this seems to me to be a missed opportunity.

As the WEC pointed out, honour-based abuse remains a hidden crime and one that victims are hesitant to report without having greater assurance that they will be protected

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll