header-logo header-logo

26 April 2024 / Shabnam Ali-Khan
Issue: 8068 / Categories: Opinion , Property , Leasehold , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

Leasehold reform: a move too far?

169194
Government proposals to introduce radical reform in the leaseholder’s favour will have a huge impact on practitioners when acting for landlords, says Shabnam Ali-Khan

The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill is currently working its way through Parliament. It is proposing some radical leasehold reforms heavily in the leaseholder’s favour. These include significant changes to the landlord’s ability to recover costs when leaseholders exercise their legal rights to enfranchise or extend their leases for flats and houses. Before we delve into the somewhat complex proposals, it is useful to have an overview of the current position.

Current position

The Leasehold Reform Act 1967 governs the rights of qualifying tenants to acquire the freehold or a 50-year lease extension of their house. Pursuant to s 9 of the 1967 Act, the landlord is entitled to recover their reasonable costs in relation to most aspects of the claim, including investigating the right to acquire or extend, as well as the conveyancing and the valuation costs. The Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll