header-logo header-logo

A new dawn for supervision?

255676
© Getty images
Chris Dyke & Sophie Ruffles set out what the Financial Conduct Authority’s anti-money laundering takeover is likely to mean for law firms
  • HM Treasury plans to transfer anti-money laundering (AML) supervision of law firms to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) by 2029.
  • Although AML obligations will remain the same, firms should expect stricter oversight, stronger enforcement and greater focus on governance.

In June, HM Treasury published the consultation response on the powers the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) will have when it becomes supervisor for anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) compliance of professional services firms, including law firms.

The transfer of supervision to the FCA is intended to create a single, more robust structure with clearer accountability, improved transparency and stronger enforcement. The changes are subject to the passage of enabling legislation, confirmation of funding arrangements and the development of a detailed transition and delivery plan. In practice, this means that full implementation is unlikely to take effect until at least 2029.

Key

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll