header-logo header-logo

A new dawn for supervision?

255676
© Getty images
Chris Dyke & Sophie Ruffles set out what the Financial Conduct Authority’s anti-money laundering takeover is likely to mean for law firms
  • HM Treasury plans to transfer anti-money laundering (AML) supervision of law firms to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) by 2029.
  • Although AML obligations will remain the same, firms should expect stricter oversight, stronger enforcement and greater focus on governance.

In June, HM Treasury published the consultation response on the powers the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) will have when it becomes supervisor for anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) compliance of professional services firms, including law firms.

The transfer of supervision to the FCA is intended to create a single, more robust structure with clearer accountability, improved transparency and stronger enforcement. The changes are subject to the passage of enabling legislation, confirmation of funding arrangements and the development of a detailed transition and delivery plan. In practice, this means that full implementation is unlikely to take effect until at least 2029.

Key

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll