header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
31 October 2025 / Rebecca Hughes
Issue: 8137 / Categories: Opinion , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

A new era for AML supervision

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
234245
Ambitious plans to transform the FCA into a super regulator will test the organisation’s capacity & adaptability, but the true test will be in delivery, says Rebecca Hughes

After two years of deliberation, the government has finally published its response to the 2023 consultation on reforming the UK’s anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing (AML/CTF) supervisory regime. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has been crowned the Single Professional Services Supervisor (SPSS), a surprising outcome for many, not least the professions that will now fall under the FCA’s oversight.

The UK system currently comprises three statutory regulators—the FCA, HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) and the Gambling Commission, alongside 22 Professional Body Supervisors (PBSs) overseeing the legal and accountancy sectors. Each PBS is responsible for ensuring that its supervised population complies with the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (MLRs).

This structure has long attracted criticism. The 2015 national risk assessment (the UK’s first comprehensive assessment of money laundering and terrorist financing risk) first

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll