header-logo header-logo

A prince in all but name

23 May 2019 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 7841 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

A child who is the great-grandson of a reigning Queen could never be anything but royal, as Michael Nash explains

The birth and naming of a son to Prince Harry and his wife Meghan is certainly in keeping with the line they are taking within the Royal Family. Whichever line they were to take it is inescapable that they are part of the most famous and elevated family in the world: who are their competitors?

One of the most interesting spin-offs from the population living longer than it did is that we get to know our great-grandchildren, something vouchsafed only to women generally before. Thus Queen Victoria did know her great-grandchildren, but George V and George VI did not. Queen Elizabeth II and her nonagenarian husband, the Duke of Edinburgh, now have eight great-grandchildren. This may explain why George V in 1917 did not provide for the contingency of great-grandchildren, with regard to titles, although there is one important clause in the Letters Patent issued on December 11th of that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll