header-logo header-logo

A question of expertise

255694
© Getty images

Affifa Farrukh & John F Mayberry examine whether clinicians & expert witnesses are always as qualified as they appear

The creation of foundation trusts gave hospital managements a wide range of powers. Among these was the ability to appoint consultants outside the guidelines promoted by the Royal Colleges and the General Medical Council (GMC). The purpose of those guidelines was to ensure a high-quality and consistent service to patients across the UK, and this included an insistence that candidates had completed a recognised training programme in the specialty either in the UK or other member states of the EU.

However, as a result of the loosening of this earlier control, there has been an exponential rise in the appointment of consultants to substantive posts who have not completed such a recognised training programme. Indeed, candidates are being appointed who have never successfully taken any postgraduate clinical examination in the UK or the EU. Nevertheless, their status within a trust is identical to that of consultants who are on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll