header-logo header-logo

17 October 2025 / James Naylor
Issue: 8135 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Upward-only rent reviews: A real battle?

232362
The prohibition of upward-only rent reviews represents a significant shift in the balance of power between landlords & tenants: but are they at war to begin with? James Naylor reports
  • The English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill proposes banning upward-only rent reviews in new commercial leases, aiming to rebalance power between landlords and tenants and support high street revitalisation.

Is the relationship between landlord and tenant inevitably adversarial, with each party seeking to maximise their own advantage at the expense of the other? Or is this a reductive view of what is, in reality, a more nuanced commercial partnership—one in which the interests of both parties may, at times, be aligned?

These questions are particularly pertinent in the context of government intervention: should the state restrict the freedom of landlords and tenants to agree rent review mechanisms? And, more fundamentally, can regulating rent review alone address the persistent issue of vacant high streets and the potential associated rise in anti-social behaviour?

Legislative & policy context

Answers may

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll