header-logo header-logo

04 June 2021 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7935 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Disregarding expert evidence: what's a reasonable rejection?

50428
Judges need to be on firm ground when disregarding good & persuasive expert evidence, as Dr Chris Pamplin explains
  • Fact finding commences with the taking of evidence of reliable, contemporaneous documents.
  • Proper and appropriate weight should be given to expert evidence.

It is reasonable to expect that where expert evidence is given by a well-qualified expert in an established field, the court would need very good reasons to disregard it. But to what extent is this required and how far should the judge go in giving reasonable grounds for disregarding what is, prima facie, good and persuasive expert evidence?

In Brunt v Wrangle [2021] 1 WLUK 332, Mr Justice Green heard the appeal of two appellants in probate proceedings. These were the mother and brother of a deceased person who had originally been granted letters of administration on the basis that the deceased had died intestate. Some ten years after the grant, an uncle of the deceased, supported by the deceased’s sister, had come forward with a document purporting

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll