header-logo header-logo

04 June 2021 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7935 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Disregarding expert evidence: what's a reasonable rejection?

50428
Judges need to be on firm ground when disregarding good & persuasive expert evidence, as Dr Chris Pamplin explains
  • Fact finding commences with the taking of evidence of reliable, contemporaneous documents.
  • Proper and appropriate weight should be given to expert evidence.

It is reasonable to expect that where expert evidence is given by a well-qualified expert in an established field, the court would need very good reasons to disregard it. But to what extent is this required and how far should the judge go in giving reasonable grounds for disregarding what is, prima facie, good and persuasive expert evidence?

In Brunt v Wrangle [2021] 1 WLUK 332, Mr Justice Green heard the appeal of two appellants in probate proceedings. These were the mother and brother of a deceased person who had originally been granted letters of administration on the basis that the deceased had died intestate. Some ten years after the grant, an uncle of the deceased, supported by the deceased’s sister, had come forward with a document purporting

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll