header-logo header-logo

04 April 2025 / Iris Karaman , Kate Chan
Issue: 8111 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , ESG , Regulatory , EU , Commercial
printer mail-detail

A shift towards efficiency or unintended complexity?

214570
Iris Karaman & Kate Chan discuss the practical impact of the EU’s proposed ‘Omnibus’ package
  • While the Omnibus presents relief for businesses, lessening compliance burdens, it does create uncertainty as to implementation across member states, especially while legislation is finalised.

The European Commission’s recently announced ‘Omnibus’ package consists of a wide range of proposed amendments to corporate sustainability requirements across key EU laws, including the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), and the EU Taxonomy Regulation. The initiative seeks to alleviate regulatory burdens on businesses while maintaining the European Green Deal’s core objectives. However, the attempt to simplify sustainability compliance could introduce fresh legal uncertainties and diverging national implementations.

Omnibus package overview & rationale

The package is largely a response to industry concerns about excessive sustainability regulatory burdens and compliance costs, particularly for small and mid-sized enterprises. The EU’s ambitious sustainability agenda, while groundbreaking, has also been a source of frustration for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll