header-logo header-logo

A shift towards efficiency or unintended complexity?

04 April 2025 / Iris Karaman , Kate Chan
Issue: 8111 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , ESG , Regulatory , EU , Commercial
printer mail-detail
214570
Iris Karaman & Kate Chan discuss the practical impact of the EU’s proposed ‘Omnibus’ package
  • While the Omnibus presents relief for businesses, lessening compliance burdens, it does create uncertainty as to implementation across member states, especially while legislation is finalised.

The European Commission’s recently announced ‘Omnibus’ package consists of a wide range of proposed amendments to corporate sustainability requirements across key EU laws, including the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), and the EU Taxonomy Regulation. The initiative seeks to alleviate regulatory burdens on businesses while maintaining the European Green Deal’s core objectives. However, the attempt to simplify sustainability compliance could introduce fresh legal uncertainties and diverging national implementations.

Omnibus package overview & rationale

The package is largely a response to industry concerns about excessive sustainability regulatory burdens and compliance costs, particularly for small and mid-sized enterprises. The EU’s ambitious sustainability agenda, while groundbreaking, has also been a source of frustration for companies

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Jersey litigation lead appointed to global STEP Council

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

Firm invests in future talent with new training cohort

360 Law Group—Anthony Gahan

360 Law Group—Anthony Gahan

Investment banking veteran appointed as chairman to drive global growth

NEWS
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors examine recent international relocation cases where allegations of domestic abuse shaped outcomes
back-to-top-scroll