header-logo header-logo

A shift towards efficiency or unintended complexity?

04 April 2025 / Iris Karaman , Kate Chan
Issue: 8111 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , ESG , Regulatory , EU , Commercial
printer mail-detail
214570
Iris Karaman & Kate Chan discuss the practical impact of the EU’s proposed ‘Omnibus’ package
  • While the Omnibus presents relief for businesses, lessening compliance burdens, it does create uncertainty as to implementation across member states, especially while legislation is finalised.

The European Commission’s recently announced ‘Omnibus’ package consists of a wide range of proposed amendments to corporate sustainability requirements across key EU laws, including the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), and the EU Taxonomy Regulation. The initiative seeks to alleviate regulatory burdens on businesses while maintaining the European Green Deal’s core objectives. However, the attempt to simplify sustainability compliance could introduce fresh legal uncertainties and diverging national implementations.

Omnibus package overview & rationale

The package is largely a response to industry concerns about excessive sustainability regulatory burdens and compliance costs, particularly for small and mid-sized enterprises. The EU’s ambitious sustainability agenda, while groundbreaking, has also been a source of frustration for companies

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll