header-logo header-logo

19 June 2026 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 8166 / Categories: Features , In Court , Criminal , Diversity
printer mail-detail

A troublesome report for the Ministry of Justice

252772
© Getty images

Michael Zander KC on the Justice Committee’s report on the Bill to cut jury trials

  • In its recent report on the Courts and Tribunals Bill, the Justice Committee did not reject the government’s jury trial reforms but raised serious concerns about magistrates’ courts’ capacity and recommended substantial amendments to the Bill.
  • The report also warns of equality and diversity issues, highlighting the lack of Black judges and calling for reforms to improve judicial representation.

Controversy rages over the first seven clauses of the Courts and Tribunals Bill which enshrine the government’s proposal to cut jury trials.

The Justice Committee report on the Bill (published 10 June) does not challenge the central proposals. The committee’s five Labour Party members defeated an amendment moved by the three other members (two Conservative, one Liberal Democrat) disapproving the Bill’s first seven clauses.

For the Ministry of Justice, that was the good news. The not-so-good news was that the committee’s 109-page report points out serious problems and recommends

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll