header-logo header-logo

24 July 2008 / Craig Carr , Christina Lyons
Issue: 7331 / Categories: Features , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Ability matters

Should the intellectually disabled be readmitted to the Paralympics, ask Christina Lyons and Craig Carr

In 2000 the International Paralympics Committee (IPC) indefinitely suspended athletes with intellectual disabilities from participating in the Paralympic Games. The justification for the suspension was the lack of consensus on the eligibility criteria for intellectual disabilities. The Equality and Human Rights Commission as well as voluntary sector organisations such as MENCAP and RADAR have been lobbying to have the suspended athletes reinstated and have been exhorting the government to pressure the International Paralympics Committee to remove the suspicion in time for the Games in London 2012

Athletes with intellectual disabilities were first allowed to participate in the 1996 Paralympic Games in Atlanta. The criteria used to assess whether an individual was “intellectually disabled” was whether their IQ was below 75. Anyone who wanted to compete in the games and claimed to be intellectually disabled had to produce a psychologist's report confirming that their IQ fell below the requisite standard.

Scandal

The IPC dropped events for intellectually disabled athletes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll