header-logo header-logo

24 July 2008 / Craig Carr , Christina Lyons
Issue: 7331 / Categories: Features , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Ability matters

Should the intellectually disabled be readmitted to the Paralympics, ask Christina Lyons and Craig Carr

In 2000 the International Paralympics Committee (IPC) indefinitely suspended athletes with intellectual disabilities from participating in the Paralympic Games. The justification for the suspension was the lack of consensus on the eligibility criteria for intellectual disabilities. The Equality and Human Rights Commission as well as voluntary sector organisations such as MENCAP and RADAR have been lobbying to have the suspended athletes reinstated and have been exhorting the government to pressure the International Paralympics Committee to remove the suspicion in time for the Games in London 2012

Athletes with intellectual disabilities were first allowed to participate in the 1996 Paralympic Games in Atlanta. The criteria used to assess whether an individual was “intellectually disabled” was whether their IQ was below 75. Anyone who wanted to compete in the games and claimed to be intellectually disabled had to produce a psychologist's report confirming that their IQ fell below the requisite standard.

Scandal

The IPC dropped events for intellectually disabled athletes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll