header-logo header-logo

24 July 2008 / Craig Carr , Christina Lyons
Issue: 7331 / Categories: Features , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Ability matters

Should the intellectually disabled be readmitted to the Paralympics, ask Christina Lyons and Craig Carr

In 2000 the International Paralympics Committee (IPC) indefinitely suspended athletes with intellectual disabilities from participating in the Paralympic Games. The justification for the suspension was the lack of consensus on the eligibility criteria for intellectual disabilities. The Equality and Human Rights Commission as well as voluntary sector organisations such as MENCAP and RADAR have been lobbying to have the suspended athletes reinstated and have been exhorting the government to pressure the International Paralympics Committee to remove the suspicion in time for the Games in London 2012

Athletes with intellectual disabilities were first allowed to participate in the 1996 Paralympic Games in Atlanta. The criteria used to assess whether an individual was “intellectually disabled” was whether their IQ was below 75. Anyone who wanted to compete in the games and claimed to be intellectually disabled had to produce a psychologist's report confirming that their IQ fell below the requisite standard.

Scandal

The IPC dropped events for intellectually disabled athletes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
back-to-top-scroll