header-logo header-logo

24 July 2008 / Craig Carr , Christina Lyons
Issue: 7331 / Categories: Features , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Ability matters

Should the intellectually disabled be readmitted to the Paralympics, ask Christina Lyons and Craig Carr

In 2000 the International Paralympics Committee (IPC) indefinitely suspended athletes with intellectual disabilities from participating in the Paralympic Games. The justification for the suspension was the lack of consensus on the eligibility criteria for intellectual disabilities. The Equality and Human Rights Commission as well as voluntary sector organisations such as MENCAP and RADAR have been lobbying to have the suspended athletes reinstated and have been exhorting the government to pressure the International Paralympics Committee to remove the suspicion in time for the Games in London 2012

Athletes with intellectual disabilities were first allowed to participate in the 1996 Paralympic Games in Atlanta. The criteria used to assess whether an individual was “intellectually disabled” was whether their IQ was below 75. Anyone who wanted to compete in the games and claimed to be intellectually disabled had to produce a psychologist's report confirming that their IQ fell below the requisite standard.

Scandal

The IPC dropped events for intellectually disabled athletes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll