header-logo header-logo

27 September 2012
Issue: 7531 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Abu Hamza shown red card

Request for case to be re-opened rejected by Grand Chamber Panel

The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights has given the final all-clear to the extradition to the US of Abu Hamza, Babar Ahmad and three other terrorism suspects.

The five had appealed a unanimous ruling by the Court in April that their potential imprisonment in a US “supermax” prison would amount to “inhuman and degrading treatment” under Art 3 of the European Convention, in Babar Ahmad & Ors v UK (App Nos 24027/07, 11949/08, 36742/08, 66911/09 and 67354/09).

Their extradition was put on hold until the appeal was heard.

This week, however, the Grand Chamber Panel decided to reject the five men’s request that the case be re-opened. This means the Court’s judgment in April is final.

Roger Smith, director of human rights group Justice, said: “It’s the correct decision.

“It’s a good example of how the European Convention protects the outer posts of the constitution and leaves a whole range of decisions up to politicians and decision-makers.

“Some people might think Abu Hamza and Baber Ahmad should not be sent to the US because of the disproportionality of the sentences they might receive, but that’s a political argument – it’s not a human rights or a constitutional argument. So too, is the agreement with the US over extradition, which Justice has opposed.

“Abu Hamza generally gets no sympathy, but the Baber Ahmad case is more ambiguous and does attract sympathy, and we have the extradition case of [Pentagon hacker] Gary McKinnon to come. I think Ahmad should be charged and prosecuted in the UK.”

Smith said European Court of Human Rights cases such as this could be speeded up if the Court was given more funds.

“It is short of funding and has a massive backlog of about 100,000 cases. This means cases can go into a black hole.”

Hamza faces charges on 11 different counts in the US, related to the taking of 16 hostages in Yemen in 1998, advocating violent jihad in Afghanistan in 2001 and conspiring to establish a jihad training camp in Oregon, US between June 2000 and December 2001.

Ahmad, an IT specialist who allegedly promoted terrorism through a website, has been held without trial for eight years.

 

Issue: 7531 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll