header-logo header-logo

23 January 2020 / John Cooper KC
Issue: 7871 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

Access all areas?

14469
John Cooper QC makes a case for open justice

The recent news that ministers have tabled draft legislation that would allow sentencing remarks from judges to be broadcast within two months has met with a mixed reception. The Victims’ Commissioner for England and Wales said that the proposal to broadcast sentencing remarks was ‘well overdue’ and the Lord Chief Justice has also given an enthusiastic ‘thumbs up’ to the measure. Despite this, the Bar Council seem sceptical about the measure, warning that the move could turn sentencing into a ‘spectator sport’ and fretting that we must ‘guard against unwarranted attacks on judges where the sentence isn’t popular with the public’.

The Crown Court (Recording and Broadcasting) Order 2020 was laid in Parliament on 15 January and provides for cameras to broadcast the sentencing remarks by High Court and senior circuit judges in the Old Bailey and other high profile crown courts across the country and is a development of access given to the Court of Appeal in 2013, where three major

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll