header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
03 July 2026 / Thomas Rothwell , Kavish Shah
Issue: 8168 / Categories: Features , Property , Landlord&tenant , CPR
printer mail-detail

Access all areas?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
253825
© Getty images

The King of England & all his forces dare not cross the threshold, but the Civil Procedure Committee may… Thomas Rothwell & Kavish Shah report
  • The article reviews conflicting court decisions on whether landlords can be authorised to force entry to carry out essential safety inspections when tenants refuse access.
  • The authors argue that higher-court guidance is needed to clarify landlords’ enforcement options and resolve the current legal uncertainty.

The County Court is facing an increasing number of cases in which residential landlords are asking for permission to break the lock to enter their tenant’s home, in order to carry out necessary safety inspections, when that tenant has failed to comply with a prior injunction requiring them to provide access. There is no agreed approach to such cases, and recent disagreements in the County Court show the need for the higher courts to provide some definitive guidance.

There are a number of reasons why residential landlords may have a legitimate need to enter their tenant’s home: for example,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Womble Bond Dickinson—Paula Myers

Womble Bond Dickinson—Paula Myers

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Paula Myers to private capital team in Leeds

mfg Solicitors—five promotions

mfg Solicitors—five promotions

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces five promotions at Birmingham office

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Beyond AI hallucinations
The legal profession's AI challenge extends far beyond fabricated case citations, according to a warning about the next phase of technological risk
NLJ this week: AML supervision shake-up
Law firms should use the transition period before the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) assumes anti-money laundering (AML) supervision to strengthen governance and compliance, experts have warned
NLJ this week: Options for global evidence gathering
Cross-border disputes increasingly demand creative approaches to gathering evidence, with litigators needing to look beyond traditional letters of request
NLJ this week: Indefinite or forever?
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified the distinction between contracts of 'indefinite' and 'perpetual' duration, with potentially significant implications for commercial drafting
NLJ this week: Proscription appeal upheld
The Court of Appeal was entitled to uphold the government's decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, according to an analysis of the ruling
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll