header-logo header-logo

09 January 2024
Issue: 8054 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Action sought on Post Office scandal

Hundreds of wrongfully convicted former sub-postmasters have yet to come forward and seek justice, according to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC)

Hundreds of wrongfully convicted former sub-postmasters have yet to come forward and seek justice, according to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC)

Errors created by the faulty Horizon IT accounting system led the Post Office to wrongfully prosecute and convict sub-postmasters of fraud, theft or false accounting over the course of two decades. About 20 victims served time in prison, while others opted to plead guilty to avoid prison and many suffered financial ruin.

The CCRC has referred 70 convictions to the appeal courts, with 62 convictions overturned. In order to refer, the person concerned must choose to appeal and the Horizon evidence must have been essential to their conviction.

CCRC chair, Helen Pitcher said: ‘However, hundreds of potential applicants have still not come forward—whether that’s directly to the Court of Appeal or requesting a review from the CCRC.

‘Some might understandably still be traumatised by what has happened to them and to their loved ones, but we can help and we encourage them to contact us.’

A widely-watched four-part ITV drama this month about the scandal, Mr Bates v The Post Office, portrayed the work of James Hartley, partner at Freeths, whose team acted for 555 sub-postmasters with the Post Office eventually settling, issuing a formal apology paying £57.75m in compensation and agreeing to implement a compensation scheme for thousands of others.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak told the BBC this week the Justice Secretary Alex Chalk is considering whether all the convictions could be overturned and whether the Post office could lose its prosecutorial powers.

Neil Hudgell, executive chairman at Hudgell Solicitors, who has acted for 73 wrongly convicted sub-postmasters, said he has received 50 enquiries since the ITV drama and hopes it will encourage more to come forward.

‘People may have left the jurisdiction, others may be elderly and not in touch with many people socially, and some may have died and kept what happened secret from their families because of the shame they felt at the time,’ he said.

‘Equally some may just remain fearful of entering any legal process that involves the Post Office.’

An ongoing statutory inquiry led by Sir Wyn Williams, the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry, is due to conclude in the spring or summer.

Issue: 8054 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll