header-logo header-logo

Action sought on Post Office scandal

09 January 2024
Issue: 8054 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail
Hundreds of wrongfully convicted former sub-postmasters have yet to come forward and seek justice, according to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC)

Hundreds of wrongfully convicted former sub-postmasters have yet to come forward and seek justice, according to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC)

Errors created by the faulty Horizon IT accounting system led the Post Office to wrongfully prosecute and convict sub-postmasters of fraud, theft or false accounting over the course of two decades. About 20 victims served time in prison, while others opted to plead guilty to avoid prison and many suffered financial ruin.

The CCRC has referred 70 convictions to the appeal courts, with 62 convictions overturned. In order to refer, the person concerned must choose to appeal and the Horizon evidence must have been essential to their conviction.

CCRC chair, Helen Pitcher said: ‘However, hundreds of potential applicants have still not come forward—whether that’s directly to the Court of Appeal or requesting a review from the CCRC.

‘Some might understandably still be traumatised by what has happened to them and to their loved ones, but we can help and we encourage them to contact us.’

A widely-watched four-part ITV drama this month about the scandal, Mr Bates v The Post Office, portrayed the work of James Hartley, partner at Freeths, whose team acted for 555 sub-postmasters with the Post Office eventually settling, issuing a formal apology paying £57.75m in compensation and agreeing to implement a compensation scheme for thousands of others.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak told the BBC this week the Justice Secretary Alex Chalk is considering whether all the convictions could be overturned and whether the Post office could lose its prosecutorial powers.

Neil Hudgell, executive chairman at Hudgell Solicitors, who has acted for 73 wrongly convicted sub-postmasters, said he has received 50 enquiries since the ITV drama and hopes it will encourage more to come forward.

‘People may have left the jurisdiction, others may be elderly and not in touch with many people socially, and some may have died and kept what happened secret from their families because of the shame they felt at the time,’ he said.

‘Equally some may just remain fearful of entering any legal process that involves the Post Office.’

An ongoing statutory inquiry led by Sir Wyn Williams, the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry, is due to conclude in the spring or summer.

Issue: 8054 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll