header-logo header-logo

13 May 2020
Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Adams has Maze convictions quashed

Former Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams has won a Supreme Court case to erase two historic convictions for trying to escape from the Maze Prison on Christmas Eve in 1973 and again in 1974

Adams was one of about 2,000 people interned in Ireland by the British government during this time.

In a unanimous decision, R v Adams (Northern Ireland) [2020] UKSC 19, the court held the convictions were unsafe because the interim custody order to detain him was not properly authorised by the then Home Secretary, Willie Whitelaw. It concluded that parliament intended the power to detain to be exercised by the Secretary of State personally. As Whitelaw did not personally consider Adams’ detention, the order was invalid and his convictions should be quashed.

Delivering the judgment, Lord Kerr said: ‘Mr Adams’ detention was unlawful, hence his convictions of attempting to escape from lawful custody were, likewise, unlawful.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll