header-logo header-logo

13 May 2020
Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Adams has Maze convictions quashed

Former Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams has won a Supreme Court case to erase two historic convictions for trying to escape from the Maze Prison on Christmas Eve in 1973 and again in 1974

Adams was one of about 2,000 people interned in Ireland by the British government during this time.

In a unanimous decision, R v Adams (Northern Ireland) [2020] UKSC 19, the court held the convictions were unsafe because the interim custody order to detain him was not properly authorised by the then Home Secretary, Willie Whitelaw. It concluded that parliament intended the power to detain to be exercised by the Secretary of State personally. As Whitelaw did not personally consider Adams’ detention, the order was invalid and his convictions should be quashed.

Delivering the judgment, Lord Kerr said: ‘Mr Adams’ detention was unlawful, hence his convictions of attempting to escape from lawful custody were, likewise, unlawful.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis will mark the 80th anniversary of Shawcross and Beaumont on Air Law with a live podcast exploring the evolution of aviation law from the Chicago Convention to the challenges facing modern aerospace, taking place on Tuesday 29 September
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
Foreign judgment creditors have gained a route to recovery after the Supreme Court’s ruling in Drelle v Servis-Terminal
Surrogacy is growing in popularity, but parents-to-be face a complex legal framework
Winning a judgment may be only the beginning of an expensive enforcement battle, writes Professor Dominic Regan in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll