header-logo header-logo

26 February 2009 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7358 / Categories: Features , Public , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Adding insult to injury

Personal injury victims deserve a guarantee that their compensation needs will be met, says Richard Scorer

Mesothelioma, a cancer of the lining of the lungs caused by exposure to asbestos, may not develop until as much as 40 years after the original exposure. Often, by the time the disease is diagnosed, the employer has gone out of business. This means that for many victims of industrial diseases, winning a compensation claim in the courts is only half the legal battle. Getting paid out by the defunct company responsible for causing the disease can be at least as difficult.

 

A traceable history?

Getting paid out often depends, of course, on the availability of employers’ liability (EL) insurance—which in turn depends on whether or not the EL insurer from the relevant period can be traced. The Employers Liability (Compulsory Insurance) 1969 Act came into force in 1972 and since then, all employers have been required by law to have in place insurance to pay compensation if the employee has

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll