header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
08 June 2018 / Cathrine Grubb
Issue: 7796 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

An adjacent duty of care?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7796_grubb

If a hedgerow or tree is a risk to motorists, can the landowner be held liable? Cathrine Grubb investigates

  • Are owners of land adjoining the highway liable for risks to motorists such as vegetation that restricts visibility?
  • Reviews the case of Sumner v Colborne & Others.

Accidents at road junctions are not unusual. However, in the case of Sumner v Colborne & Others [2018] EWCA Civ 1006 such an accident gave rise to a novel question: can owners of land adjoining the highway be liable for dangers on their land that make the highway more dangerous? The judgment in Sumner not only deals with this issue but provides a helpful illustration of how to determine whether a duty of care exists in novel cases.

The collision

The danger in Sumner was vegetation planted on adjoining land that severely restricted the visibility at a junction on the A494. The A494 had a 60-mph speed limit. Guidelines for the development of new junctions require stopping distance sight of at least 122m on such roads. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Appeal court reins in ‘wrong defendant’ switcheroo

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: CPR tweak closes third-party disclosure gap
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
NLJ this week: Court of Appeals wrestles with Mazur fallout
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’
NLJ this week: Driving test fraudsters steer towards jail
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
NLJ this week: Deepfakes demand data law muscle
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll