header-logo header-logo

Adjudication and CVA's

19 February 2009
Issue: 7357 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Elspeth Owens highlights the relevance of the financial difficulties of a judgment creditor to the enforcement of an adjudicator’s award

CVAs & the enforcement of adjudicator awards

(Ref. NLJ, KnowHow,13 February 2009, p 228  and Mead General Building Ltd v Dartmoor Properties Ltd [2009] EWHC 200 (TCC))

 

Last week Janna Purdie discussed some of the issues affecting adjudication awards in the current economic climate. This week’s article examines the impact of Creditors Voluntary Agreements (CVAs) on the enforcement of an adjudicator’s award. Mr Justice Coulson, in the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) held that:

 the fact that a claimant is the subject of a CVA is a relevant (but not conclusive) factor for the court to take into account when deciding whether to grant a stay of execution pursuant to RSC Order 47 after the grant of summary judgment to enforce an adjudicator’s decision.

 

Facts of the case

An adjudicator ordered (the employer) to pay sums just short of £350,000 to Mead (the contractor).

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll