header-logo header-logo

Adjudication and CVA's

19 February 2009
Issue: 7357 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Elspeth Owens highlights the relevance of the financial difficulties of a judgment creditor to the enforcement of an adjudicator’s award

CVAs & the enforcement of adjudicator awards

(Ref. NLJ, KnowHow,13 February 2009, p 228  and Mead General Building Ltd v Dartmoor Properties Ltd [2009] EWHC 200 (TCC))

 

Last week Janna Purdie discussed some of the issues affecting adjudication awards in the current economic climate. This week’s article examines the impact of Creditors Voluntary Agreements (CVAs) on the enforcement of an adjudicator’s award. Mr Justice Coulson, in the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) held that:

 the fact that a claimant is the subject of a CVA is a relevant (but not conclusive) factor for the court to take into account when deciding whether to grant a stay of execution pursuant to RSC Order 47 after the grant of summary judgment to enforce an adjudicator’s decision.

 

Facts of the case

An adjudicator ordered (the employer) to pay sums just short of £350,000 to Mead (the contractor).

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
back-to-top-scroll