header-logo header-logo

22 March 2019 / Shamilee Arora , Arish Bharucha
Issue: 7833 / Categories: Features , Arbitration , ADR , Profession
printer mail-detail

ADR in India: modernisation & harmonisation

Shamilee Arora & Arish Bharucha review recent developments in Indian arbitration & insolvency law

 
  • In a rapidly developing economic climate, the Indian legislative framework is evolving to accommodate the needs of commercial parties as they have recourse to the Indian legal system.

In the first section of this article, we consider the changes in the legal framework in relation to arbitration —a fast growing means of dispute resolution for commercial parties both from within India and foreign entities investing in India. In Section II, we consider the recent modernisation and harmonisation of the statute in relation to the insolvency of commercial entities (with the exception of financial services providers and institutions) by means of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 (the 2016 Code).

Commercial arbitration

In 2015, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (the 1996 Act) which governs arbitrations seated in India, was amended by means of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act 2015 (the Amendment). The main aim of the Amendment was to modernise and update the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll